Bože! A Grace Catholic Project

Bože!
Is Priesthood Always Public – Part I

The other day when we were discussing the symbolism of “the collar” John asked: “Is priesthood always a public office? I’ll give you that historically that has been the case most of the time….. but what about monastic priests (e.g. Carthusians) with no public ministry? Or hermit priests in the desert or on Mt Athos?”

At the time I answered quickly “yes the priesthood is absolutely a public office” and promised to explain myself more fully later. I’ve been playing with this now for a few days it will take a few postings but I’m going to begin an attempt at an explanation. This is not a systematic approach and is in no particular order – this by way of asking for your patience whilst I hap-hazardly cobble my thoughts together.

John’s example of monks is interesting. Asceticism is first and foremost an individual spiritual discipline. The ascetic withdraws from “the World” to persue a life dedicated to transcendence. This is a private, personalised discipline that was quickly drawn into the “public” life of the church in a number of ways.

Individuals, for various reasons relating to the spiritual life, sought out the ascetics, drawing them away from their isolation into the life of the community. Asceticism then evolves to take on the character of a teaching office. Famous examples include St. Antony who lived in solitude for twenty years (I think that’s right) before returning to teach others how to benefit from what he learned. The “private” evolved and became very “public”.

Athanasius, Gregory of Nazianzen, Chrysostom, Jerome and others presented the life and discipline of the ascetic as examples for emulation. These “living martyrs” bore witness to the truth of the Gospel, and the benefits of philosophy. A community that was surrounded by ascetics, and which had a cadre of virgins dwelling among them, was a blessed and protected community. These individuals, practicing a very individualised spirituality became the first line of spiritual (and physical) defence for the community of believers. Their “private” life of prayer and discipline – was now VERY “public”.

Christianity is, in its essence an explicitly corporate, communal, public, faith tradition. This is one reason why classical and neo-gnosticism, and New Age teaching are in some respects anti-thetical to the Christian tradition.

Athonite and Carthusian monks do provide a “public” ministry because their life and example are known to be a part of the life of the “whole” body of the community of believers in their particular tradition. These individuals have withdrawn from “the World” but have not left what St. Athanasius calls the “civic life” i.e. the life, cycles, customs, and vision of the community of believers.

  • Tim Cravens

    All sacraments are always public — even the Office is always public prayer, even if a layperson prays it by herself. There can never be any such thing as a “private” priest — the priest is a public representative of the church, and can never be otherwise.

    That being said, not all public ministry that is done by a public priest is necessarily done in the full sight of everyone — and the classic example would be the sacrament of Reconciliation. Every confession heard by a priest is a public act of worship — yet, paradoxically, the priest is bound by the seal of the confessional from ever revealing to a single other person the contents of that public act of worship. Similarly, a Carthusian priest is ordained without any public ministry other than that to other Carthusians and those considering joining them ever being envisioned — yet this doesn’t negate the public nature of that ministry.

    Some indie priests are called to a hidden ministry of intercession, and almost no one else may ever know of their priesthood — this does not negate their priesthood, or its public nature (unless one wants to negate intercessory prayer, or the ecclesiological belief that we are all bound up with one another into one body by baptism) — it just means that the exercise of that ministry takes place in a different arena than that of many other priests.

  • John Plummer

    I’m going to comment on this offering – but it may grow into a post on my blog in a day or two, as soon as time allows. Thanks for fostering such interesting discussion as always!

  • Alexis Tančibok

    I think, Tim we’re on the same page here. The ordained ministry is a “public” office, but there are vital elements of that vocation – some we may not have even begun to explore yet – that are “hidden”.

    In this post I used the example of the ascetics because John’s original post grabbed my attention using their example. It is true that asceticism is a private, personal discipline – one that like the ordained ministry has a wide variety (indeed the desert fathers were loathe to systematise and homogenise their practices).

    The biggest difference between the ministry of the monk and the ministry of the ordained is that the monk started as a private practice and was dragged into the public. The ordained service is in its essence a public office. A point which I think I’ll have to play with in the next post (grin).

  • Alexis Tančibok

    Thanks John,

    I look forward to seeing your thoughts.

 
February 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829  
Holy Tweet!