Bože! A Grace Catholic Project

Bože!
Media Literacy – Can We Do Better?

We have been exploring the use of the net, and technology generally in an OC/IC context here for over a year now. But one thing that has not yet been mentioned (I think) is the idea of “media literacy” in OC/IC projects. This article by the Utne Reader – brings that idea crashing home.

The article highlights the issue of critical analysis of what we see on the web. How information is presented, and how we sift through it, assessing the veracity of that information, its accuracy, and its agenda. I suspect that when most of us were younger we were taught how to do this with “traditional” media sources – books, newspapers, magazines, journals, and film and television. But the nature of media has changed rapidly, and dramatically over the past decade – does this not also mean that the way in which we assess these sources must also change?

To my mind this is a topical issue on two fronts. Firstly – how we OC/IC folk using the net, assess those sources related to theology, history, spirituality, and religious news. How is that process affecting how we use the information both online and in our communities? Secondly – and I think I find this more important based on things we’ve been exploring here – how are we presenting our information online? Are we facilitating a sense of good critical analysis of who and what we are? Are we pointing to balanced source material? Are we presenting our message in such a way that the information-saavy will not simply click through, snorting “Quacks” as they do?

How can we help one another to make the web more of a tool and less of a novelty, or “basic” necessity in our various projects? One way might be to be helpful to one another. A bit of “peer review” amongst friends can make those seemingly minor changes that have a big impact in how our sites and vids are recieved, found, and commented upon.

  • http://raphael.doxos.com Huw Raphael

    Let’s see…. how do we present our info? It’s usually surrounded by a bouquet of the following:

    1) Extensive claims documenting our “lineage”…
    2) Pictures of gigantic churches that belong to other denominations…
    3) “Proof” that Rome or Canterbury or Istanbul or Moscow or Antioch or Syria or India “really” thinks we’re “real”…
    4) Pictures of parishes with only clergy in them…

    For starters.

  • Alexis

    Oh God! Don’t get me started! Honestly – when I see those sites – I click away – can’t take them seriously. I feel a deep sense of . . . sadness, and frustration when I encounter indie sites that employ that particular “bouquet” of dead vegetation. It says – we’re not good enough, we’re “second rate” or “second class” Christians – among other things.

 
February 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829  
Holy Tweet!